Go to A Distant Drum of the Coming Revolution
- Add a comment
- Go to So the Bush-haters want him impeached, eh?
Where to find more of kingmi's excellent wisdom
Kigmi's brillirant summary of the contradictory arguments put forth by the impeachment crowd can also be found on his blog dedicated to discussion of that line of "thought" at http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/kingmi4293/
And in fairness, faithful reader glennb's blog is at http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/Glennb/ .
posted by
WriterofLight
on June 14, 2005 at 6:23 PM
| link to this | reply
Armstrong Williams online
Thoughtful of you to ask, Glenn! Here's his website: http://www.armstrongwilliams.com/ME2/Audiences/Default.asp
Also, his columns - and a lot of other good, strong, rational conservative columns - are available at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/armstrongwilliams/archive.shtml. Visit the site and read up! It'll do you good.
posted by
WriterofLight
on June 14, 2005 at 6:18 PM
| link to this | reply
Detailed study of the daffiness of the left . . .
. . . will threaten anyone's stability, glenn! That is, of course, unless it is countered with lots of good strong conservative logic!
posted by
WriterofLight
on June 14, 2005 at 6:14 PM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi,
I am beginning to have my doubts about your stability! Are you on medication that conflict with your ability to reason!
GEORGE BUSH took to flight when the heat was on. Each time he was called to duty as a man he ran! It is easy when you own the bank to buy courage!
posted by
Glennb
on June 12, 2005 at 7:54 AM
| link to this | reply
WoL, The left has made the following arguments and conflagrations in
place of patriotism before and during a time of war.
1) Bush did not win the 2000 election; he was appointed by the Supreme Ct.
2) Bush's response to 9-11 was weak;
3) Bush's response to 9-11 was too strong;
4) Bush doesn't have what it takes to take out the Taliban;
5) Bush doesn't have what it takes to take out the Iraqi dictator;
6) Bush should let the UN fight this war, or at least go to the UN for help;
7) Bush was weak to go to the UN;
8) Bush waited too late to go into Baghdad;
9) The troops did great in Baghdad but Bush was not really in charge;
10) Bush should have known that the Baathists would go underground and conduct a prolonged insurgency;
11) Bush should not be reelected because of the Baathist insurgency; Bush has done business with the Saudis so he is a criminal;
12) John Kerry will save this nation, defeat Iraq, and restore integrity to the White House; Michael Moore will be UN Ambassador and Gov. Dean will be WH Chief of Staff;
13) Bush did not win the second election, he stole it;
14) Bush did not plan out the Iraq war far enough in advance;
15) Bush planned the war out too far in advanced and it is the smoking gun;
16) Bush should be impeached for lying about Iraq having WMD's;
17) Anyone who disagrees with this litany of contradictory accusations is delusional.
Well, all righty then!
posted by
kingmi
on June 11, 2005 at 11:47 PM
| link to this | reply
Writeroflight,
I think what people like myself will have to recognize, that we are up against "paid truth assassins" who roam the information highway with the precision of trained killers! There should be a reqirement for disclaimers for all paid hacks in media (including pundits, talk show, columnist, op-ed writers, but you know the list)! Armstrong Williams was outed! I wonder if he has landed on his ass here in Cyber space?
posted by
Glennb
on June 11, 2005 at 10:19 PM
| link to this | reply
Writeroflight,
Ahhhh!!Are these all included in the 12 charges he will face at trial? Seems like a few of the so called crimes of Saddam Hussein are beginning to fade! And you do not seem like the kind-a-guy that give a damn about the Iranians and Kuwaitis! The Jew maybe??
posted by
Glennb
on June 11, 2005 at 10:10 PM
| link to this | reply
Glenn, since vioaltion of sovereignty is an issue for you . . .
. . . what have you to say about Saddam's violations of Kuwaiti and Iranian sovereignty? Or about the soveriegnty of the Khurds he gassed? Or of the Israelis attacked by the terrorists he armed, trained, bankrolled and sheltered?
posted by
WriterofLight
on June 11, 2005 at 9:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Well-informed conservative on the job!
Welcome, hammock, and here you go! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Iraq. It should be noted that this site is not so current as to list Jalal Talabani, the newly elected president.
posted by
WriterofLight
on June 11, 2005 at 9:53 PM
| link to this | reply
Writeroflight,
The minnute someone in the bureaucracy has the balls to put their charges onthe public record not in the corporate media! Bush will be found guilty of crimes against Iraq's sovereignty! Murder under pretense and pretext! A pair of male testicles or female ovaries is all that is needed!
posted by
Glennb
on June 11, 2005 at 9:50 PM
| link to this | reply
Who was the first president of Iraq?
posted by
Hammock_Noweilz
on June 11, 2005 at 9:35 PM
| link to this | reply