Comments on Adhesive Love Versus Fluid Love

Go to SannhetseekerAdd a commentGo to Adhesive Love Versus Fluid Love

Caleb -
Thanks! It made me think a lot as I was writing it.

posted by sannhet on September 26, 2005 at 7:14 AM | link to this | reply

Metta -
A very appropriate quote. Not familiar with Dipa Ma.

posted by sannhet on September 26, 2005 at 7:13 AM | link to this | reply

Aria
You're right. Not only is the word tricky, but so is the deed, if you've got the wrong kind of love.

posted by sannhet on September 26, 2005 at 7:12 AM | link to this | reply

Avant -
Me too.

posted by sannhet on September 26, 2005 at 7:12 AM | link to this | reply

Jomei -
Thanks!

posted by sannhet on September 26, 2005 at 7:11 AM | link to this | reply

Xeno -
Good point. Adhesive love can only be possive, try to stick others to us.

posted by sannhet on September 26, 2005 at 7:11 AM | link to this | reply

You made me think!
Time for a little self-examination.

posted by calebs_blogger on September 25, 2005 at 6:38 AM | link to this | reply

excellent post
"How can you love and not attach at the same time?"

A simple example is that of water.  Nonattachment means you flow on top of the water.
You don't plunge into it.  You stay afloat without going under.  ~ Dipa Ma

posted by Metta on September 24, 2005 at 6:26 PM | link to this | reply

San-the word love is tricky. It can be a verb or a noun depends on how one uses it.

posted by Aria4 on September 24, 2005 at 8:39 AM | link to this | reply

sannhet
great post. adhesive is a very appropriate term. i had to unlearn this type of love in order to find what was real, or in your description, 'fluid'.

posted by avant-garde on September 24, 2005 at 4:01 AM | link to this | reply

that is a truly priceless definition, its already made me think
about the quality of love I give. Thanks.

posted by Jomei on September 23, 2005 at 4:25 PM | link to this | reply

adhesive love is a possession
it causes one to want to possess.

posted by Xeno-x on September 23, 2005 at 3:31 PM | link to this | reply