Comments on Just How Dumb Are You? Find Out Here! (Plus, Possibly Win Cool Prizes!)

Go to Old News (The Unbearable Lightness Of Blogging)Add a commentGo to Just How Dumb Are You? Find Out Here! (Plus, Possibly Win Cool Prizes!)

No, they weren't.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 30, 2006 at 7:28 PM | link to this | reply

I berlieve that soem of the other answers that were given were just

as valid as the one you 'chose' to be correct. The fact that they were all in pink, is just as valid!

As a treacher I must say that there is often more than one correct answer to a question and you judged us unfairly  (and now I am going to go and wobble my bottom lip somewhere else!)

posted by astraldreamer on July 30, 2006 at 12:08 AM | link to this | reply

No, food4thought, but only cause I hadn't thought of it ...

However, the more pertinent question is, had you won the contest, and I said, "Here I am (with your Scorpions)", would it have rocked you like a hurricane?

posted by Mademoiselle on July 28, 2006 at 5:22 AM | link to this | reply

M...
So you named your scorpions after The Scorpions?  Famous 80s hair band.

posted by food4thought on July 27, 2006 at 9:10 PM | link to this | reply

Although, to be honest, food4thought, they are all pretty much indistinguishable from one another, anyway ...

In fact, I'm not even sure they can tell themselves apart.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 27, 2006 at 8:27 PM | link to this | reply

Actually, .Dave., I don't recall saying she would "punch" me ...

But I see where you are going with this.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 27, 2006 at 8:24 PM | link to this | reply

M...

I will threaten no physical violence.  I’m glad I didn’t win outright anyway, it would have been hard to choose between Francis, Rudolf, Klaus, Herman or Matthias.  That is for you to figure out.

posted by food4thought on July 27, 2006 at 7:12 PM | link to this | reply

Mad One, you know you said your mother was going to punch you...

posted by _dave_says_ack_ on July 27, 2006 at 5:37 PM | link to this | reply

Yes, colbor, that is the way we spell it, actually ...

Of course, then again, that is the accurate way ... so I'm really not sure what your point was.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 27, 2006 at 1:41 PM | link to this | reply

Pernickety??

 I thought it was 'pernickety' without the 'S'. Or do MENSA members spell it with an S ??

Cheers,

 

Rob

posted by colbor1 on July 27, 2006 at 1:14 PM | link to this | reply

P.S.
I suppose food4thought can be deemed the winner by default ... considering he came the closest to answering correctly. 

posted by Mademoiselle on July 27, 2006 at 5:41 AM | link to this | reply

The answer has now been posted, so ...
I must say, I'm very disappointed in all of you.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 27, 2006 at 5:38 AM | link to this | reply

Mademoiselle

That's true about boggle.

When you said the answer was obvious, I was hoping that I was on the right track with the "all hard words" comment. hmmmmmmm.

You can't keep us in suspense forever.............are you going to let us know today if no one answers correctly?

 

posted by BlondeAmbition007 on July 26, 2006 at 11:25 PM | link to this | reply

That goes without saying, Blonde (that the words are "hard") ...
although, actually, "boggle" isn't that uncommon a word.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 11:02 PM | link to this | reply

Yeah, that's true, food4thought ...
But I'm feeling a little sleepy, actually.  So, I guess it may just have to wait until tomorrow.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 11:01 PM | link to this | reply

Mademoiselle

There all hard words that most people don't know the meaning of??

I can't wait to find out the answer.....I feel like a dumb blonde. 

posted by BlondeAmbition007 on July 26, 2006 at 10:59 PM | link to this | reply

You must tell us, you must...
Or you keep getting anwers like, following words are words that follow other words,  which excludes the list, they have nothing to do with the question, follow?

posted by food4thought on July 26, 2006 at 10:52 PM | link to this | reply

Now, I don't know whether to reveal the answer or not.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 10:29 PM | link to this | reply

I can't believe no one got this yet!
I was sure someone was going to answer inadvertently while trying to be funny.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 10:28 PM | link to this | reply

No, wait...
What all these words have in common is letters, each has a letter in the word "common", c'mon, that's gotta be it.  Really.  I'm calling my shrink.

posted by food4thought on July 26, 2006 at 10:19 PM | link to this | reply

I agree with Mysteria...
What they have in common is I will go crazy trying to figure out what they have in common, or is it all us stupid bloggers that have that in common.

posted by food4thought on July 26, 2006 at 10:15 PM | link to this | reply

Madam....They are all based in latin...
I can't help it...i'm addicted to this torture I guess...!

posted by mysteria on July 26, 2006 at 9:50 PM | link to this | reply

Actually what I guessed was that the words in the list

all follow the word "common", not the other way around.

In other words, all the words in the list are after the word "common" on the page.

I know that's probably not the answer, but I wanted to clear that up.

This is driving me nuts!

The only thing htese words seem to have in common is the fact that you typed them!!!!

posted by astraldreamer on July 26, 2006 at 6:55 PM | link to this | reply

Nope.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 6:03 PM | link to this | reply

Ok...

One last guess, emphasize guess and this will be my last one, maybe.

What they all have in common is they have nothing in common.  Good Night Chet.  Good Night Gracie.

posted by food4thought on July 26, 2006 at 5:33 PM | link to this | reply

Good call, Blanche.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 10:25 AM | link to this | reply

I was going to say something about your getting all the cool email, then I
realized that that would only make me sound a:) catty and b) it might invite unwanted email.  So, I won't. 

posted by Blanche. on July 26, 2006 at 10:08 AM | link to this | reply

You're welcome, Blanche!

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 10:06 AM | link to this | reply

Nope, not the syllables ...

Besides, someone already guessed that via email.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 10:05 AM | link to this | reply

Thank you!!!

posted by Blanche. on July 26, 2006 at 9:54 AM | link to this | reply

Okay, we've ruled out language. Too simple. Meaning? Persnickety and
supercilious are somewhat similar in meaning, but not the rest.  Number of syllables?  I am totally flummoxed.

posted by Blanche. on July 26, 2006 at 9:54 AM | link to this | reply

What I will do, Blanche, is wait until tonight (and my first post of the "new season") ...

If no one has answered it by then, I will end the suffering.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:53 AM | link to this | reply

This puzzle was a lot harder than I imagined it would be ...
I think everyone gave it way too much thought, essentially outsmarting themselves, when they should have just acknowledged the most basic similarity instead.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:51 AM | link to this | reply

Mademoiselle, no one's gotten it yet? Have mercy, tell us!

posted by Blanche. on July 26, 2006 at 9:49 AM | link to this | reply

No, you did not, .Dave., seeing as:

1) The words themselves aren't actually violet ... they are merely written that way.

2) Bandanafish already guessed that, anyway.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:49 AM | link to this | reply

Good one, ShutterCat ...

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:47 AM | link to this | reply

Sorry, Mason, the answer is not supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:46 AM | link to this | reply

Actually, Astral, the word "common" doesn't (technically) follow any of them ...

but, regardless, that isn't the answer we're looking for here.

Sorry.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:43 AM | link to this | reply

Sorry, food4thought, those elements (proper spelling, etc) would all be assumed to be the case ...

Because, otherwise, all word puzzles such as these would be rendered pointless.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 26, 2006 at 9:41 AM | link to this | reply

Just checking back to see if I've won a half-digested scorpion.

But you must still be asleep.

Unless the mummy scorpion has eaten you!!!

Please report to base soon.

posted by _dave_says_ack_ on July 26, 2006 at 7:38 AM | link to this | reply

My final offer: They are all written in 'Light Aubergine with a Hint of Vomit'. (That's a Dulux colour.)

posted by _dave_says_ack_ on July 26, 2006 at 2:16 AM | link to this | reply

Or is it puce?

posted by _dave_says_ack_ on July 26, 2006 at 2:12 AM | link to this | reply

Is it that they are all written in pink? Or cerise. Or pinky-mauve.

(Men have problems with colours)

They are all the same COLOUR!

posted by _dave_says_ack_ on July 26, 2006 at 2:09 AM | link to this | reply

floccinaucinihilipilification
bless you.

posted by AlienInsomniac on July 26, 2006 at 12:48 AM | link to this | reply

..wern't they all in a song in some movie like, Mary Poppins...
..or something like that... they were in a song I've heard... some silly musical...

posted by MasonGarrett on July 26, 2006 at 12:37 AM | link to this | reply

I'd like to guess

is it because they are all following the word "common"?

 

posted by astraldreamer on July 26, 2006 at 12:17 AM | link to this | reply

M...

A couple for the road

They are all spelled correctly

They are all read left -to-right

They are double-spaced.

I am double spaced, tomorrow...

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 11:09 PM | link to this | reply

It's cool, food4thought ...

maybe you'll dream up the answer.

Goodnight.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 10:50 PM | link to this | reply

M...
Lost count...brain tired...going to bed.

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 10:39 PM | link to this | reply

How many guesses are you up to now, food4thought?

27?

btw, sadly, your temperature is decreasing again.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 10:34 PM | link to this | reply

It's really not much of a club, anyway, Tanga ...

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 10:33 PM | link to this | reply

Grrr...
They are the second part of the question, you can't get any obviouser than that. 

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 10:31 PM | link to this | reply

No idea
There goes my Mensa membership.

posted by Tanga on July 25, 2006 at 10:29 PM | link to this | reply

You're getting warmer.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 10:22 PM | link to this | reply

Ok...
What they all have in common is....They are the only words in that list.

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 10:13 PM | link to this | reply

I don't think so, food4thought ...
because those characteristics would be true of all (or, at least, many) words, and the question already establishes that they are all "words".

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 10:10 PM | link to this | reply

M...

All right, two more guesses, what they all have in common is they are all small case letters.

They are all uncommon words.

They are all in the dictionary.

They are driving me crazy.

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 10:06 PM | link to this | reply

Thanks for clearing that up, food4thought ...

I had already Googled him, however.

And your answer is invalid, because there'd be no logical reason (that I can see) to expect them to rhyme.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:58 PM | link to this | reply

Sorry, Runs at dawn ...

Only two of them are actually nouns. 

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:55 PM | link to this | reply

M...

Douglas Adams wrote The Hitchicker's Guide to the Galaxy.  Caution, if you think I am strange (and you enjoy it) read this trilogy (which contains five books) and you will then have to find out the question.

BTW, they don't rhyme, I think that might be it.  It's true, but is that it?

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 9:51 PM | link to this | reply

They are all nouns?

posted by Runs_at_dawn on July 25, 2006 at 9:50 PM | link to this | reply

I have no clue what that means, food4thought ...

And who's Douglas Adams?

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:47 PM | link to this | reply

GooD One FooDDuDe!!!
You Tickle!!!

posted by mysteria on July 25, 2006 at 9:45 PM | link to this | reply

Being a Douglas Adams fan...
I would say the answer is 42!

posted by food4thought on July 25, 2006 at 9:41 PM | link to this | reply

No (that's not the answer) and yes (they are), Mysteria.

Although, I do own other kinds, as well.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:30 PM | link to this | reply

What is the most obvious and simplest solution imaginable?!

I'm shocked no one guessed this accidentally in an attempt to be funny.  I was certain someone would.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:29 PM | link to this | reply

Are They The Names Of Your Scorpions?
Ummmm Are they Black Emperors? 

posted by mysteria on July 25, 2006 at 9:28 PM | link to this | reply

No, Mysteria!

(To both your queries.)

The question already acknowledges that they are all words.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:26 PM | link to this | reply

I think ...

I'll have to check with her to be sure, though.

Not sure where she is at present, however.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:25 PM | link to this | reply

Ummmm, is the commonality that they are all words?
Ahhhh!!!  I am GoinG BaNaNaS!!!  hehehehe!  Bananas are good things right?

posted by mysteria on July 25, 2006 at 9:24 PM | link to this | reply

no, not a psychology major!!!! Aieeeee!

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 9:17 PM | link to this | reply

She can be about as subtle as a sledgehammer (and sickle), Blanche ...

although, come to think of it, I believe she was a psychology major.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:16 PM | link to this | reply

The more psychological in nature, the more effective, Mademoiselle,
I'm sure your mother has refined her art form.  Although Russians can be somewhat crude, but effective.  I speak from experience.

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 9:08 PM | link to this | reply

I'm sure I'll be posting about the torture at some point, Blanche ...
Oh, and scorpions are more personable than you might imagine.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 9:04 PM | link to this | reply

K, Mademoiselle, I was just guessing as to what tortures your mother was
planning on inflict on you.  Probably it's more like watching reruns. Anyway, I'll take your word for it on the Scorpions. By that logic (clean and harmless) many things would make good pets, but there's still something missing, like a personality. 

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 8:52 PM | link to this | reply

Scorpions are actually wonderful pets, btw.
They are gentle and loving ... not to mention, very, very clean animals.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 8:43 PM | link to this | reply

"Wedgies", Blanche?!  Where would you get that idea from?

But no, not quite.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 8:41 PM | link to this | reply

Like what, Mademoiselle, wedgies? t've seen the ear twisting thing on tv
but I never understood why anyone would stand for that.  As for the Scorpions, even if that is my birth sign, no thanks. I'll wear a pin or something. Sometimes reality is just a little too real for me.

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 8:39 PM | link to this | reply

I guess I'm going to be stuck with, like, a few dozen more mouths to feed, then.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 8:37 PM | link to this | reply

Well, BlackPearl, don't worry too much about it ...

The answer is sort  of a joke, actually.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 8:35 PM | link to this | reply

That would be "physical violence", Blanche ...

well, sort of

Although, it's not what you're thinking.  She doesn't, like, beat me or anything.  It's something stupid.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 8:34 PM | link to this | reply

Well, Mademoiselle,
Guess I won't be taking that test anytime soon.  My guess for what these words all have in common:  rubbish!  (Okay, that's just sour grapes... I haven't a clue.)

posted by BlackPearl1 on July 25, 2006 at 8:17 PM | link to this | reply

Well, I'm boggled. My Russian teacher used to say, "The truth is simple

when you know it." befroe he told us the answer to.  Of course, he was right.  

ps, would that be physical violence, or just the usual torment? 

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 6:44 PM | link to this | reply

But, Blanche, this is (obviously) an english language blog ...

Thus it would be assumed all words included would be in english (by default).

My mother spent over 45 minutes trying to decipher the puzzle, and then when I finally told her the solution ... she threatened me with "violence".

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 6:40 PM | link to this | reply

Well, you did say the obvious answer was wrong, and to go with the even

more obvious (sorry, I can't use obviouser in a sentence, my internal censors won't allow it).  Well, technically, even English words have roots from different countries: German, Latin, Old and Middle French, even Sanskrit if you want to go that far back.  I think I may be overcomplicating things, I tend to do that. 

Your mother lied to you?  I'm shocked.  I think it's in their handbook. 

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 6:28 PM | link to this | reply

Thank you, cantey.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 6:26 PM | link to this | reply

P.S.
For many years, Blanche, my mother lied to me about my actual IQ ... although she denies doing so.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 6:25 PM | link to this | reply

Sorry, Blanche, that would be considered more or less a given ...

Plus, even so, they are of varying national origins, anyway.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 6:24 PM | link to this | reply

thsta a relief too

I always took a little pride in my vocabulary. Thought I was smart because of it.

of course, IQ is, as you point out, multifacted and complex. Many dumbasses have hight Iq's and vice versa. Then again many people wit hhigh IQ's are in fact highly intelligent. Good post.

posted by calmcantey75 on July 25, 2006 at 6:21 PM | link to this | reply

Mademoiselle, they're all in English?

I can definitely vouch for the fact that IQ and vocabulary are not necessarily correlated.  I took an IQ test (the first one I've actually been aware that I was taking, and so have any idea of the result) last winter. The psychologist was astounded that I have such a comprehensive vocabulary when I did so poorly on the actual IQ portion of the test.

I didn't tell him that I just wasn't in the mood. 

posted by Blanche. on July 25, 2006 at 6:21 PM | link to this | reply

Of course ... that doesn't mean they're mutually exclusive either, though.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 6:18 PM | link to this | reply

thats a relief

posted by calmcantey75 on July 25, 2006 at 6:14 PM | link to this | reply

Vocabulary has precious little to do with IQ, cantey ...

and this puzzle, ironically enough, has precious little to do with vocabulary.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 6:12 PM | link to this | reply

normal iq

posted by calmcantey75 on July 25, 2006 at 6:07 PM | link to this | reply

Actual conversation:

Soooo, my mother was all, like, "Mensa, huh?  Then how do you explain your lousy grades?"

I thought about it for a moment, and then said, "Statistical anomaly?"

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 5:50 PM | link to this | reply

Nope, they definitely have one thing in common.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 5:50 PM | link to this | reply

I would say they have nothing in common

posted by Runs_at_dawn on July 25, 2006 at 5:49 PM | link to this | reply

Not necessary, Runs at dawn ...

what's the simplest, most obvious possible answer you can think of?

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 5:46 PM | link to this | reply

Define "normal", cantey.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 5:45 PM | link to this | reply

Um, I don't know, Azur ... people who are smart?

And no, that answer is also incorrect.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 5:45 PM | link to this | reply

No multiple choice?
LOL

posted by Runs_at_dawn on July 25, 2006 at 5:45 PM | link to this | reply

they are words that "normal" people don't use

posted by calmcantey75 on July 25, 2006 at 5:44 PM | link to this | reply

Very cute, Bandana ...
but nope.

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 5:42 PM | link to this | reply

They are words
that only members of Mensa use. Who wants to be a member of Mensa I wonder?

posted by Azur on July 25, 2006 at 3:32 PM | link to this | reply

they are all pink.

posted by bandanafish on July 25, 2006 at 3:00 PM | link to this | reply


posted by A-and-B on July 25, 2006 at 2:40 PM | link to this | reply

Thanks, Mysteria ...

Care to hazard a guess as to the answer?

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 2:14 PM | link to this | reply

MaDam...
I KNeW it!!  You Are a sortie of supercomputers working in sublime unison...WoW a wonderous person...

posted by mysteria on July 25, 2006 at 2:13 PM | link to this | reply

floccinaucinihilipilification (noun)
definition: The act of estimating something as worthless

used in a sentence: "I was flabbergasted by her flippant floccinaucinihilipilification of his feelings!"

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 2:04 PM | link to this | reply

Thank you, Passion ... I think.

Meanwhile, the answer really is simple.

Some might even say it's a "trick question".

posted by Mademoiselle on July 25, 2006 at 2:01 PM | link to this | reply

PS-I had no idea you were a member of Mensa...
But I did know there was something different about you.

posted by Passionflower on July 25, 2006 at 1:54 PM | link to this | reply

I only have an above average IQ-
So even though the answer may seem easy to you, I'm clueless. As for the prize please don't send me scorpions!!!!!!

posted by Passionflower on July 25, 2006 at 1:52 PM | link to this | reply