Go to INFLAMMATORY RHETORIC
- Add a comment
- Go to (No subject)
CORBIN, hAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
posted by
kingmi
on September 26, 2006 at 3:53 AM
| link to this | reply
The man simply lies. It is a breathtakingly stupid claim that rightwingers, as he calls us, actually opposed his weak single effort to get bin Ladin. Throughout the late nineties, We were complaining we weren't doing anything at all about bin Ladin. We wanted more action. Not less.
The pretext for this lie is that rightwingers, did in fact "question the timing" of his one attempt to kill bin Ladin. It occurred, coindentally enough, during the Lewinsky furor. (Devil with the blue dress, blue dress on) On the eve of some testimony during the impeachment hearings; can't remember which, and it really doesn't matter.
Conservatives did not object to this attack. We were enraged, however, that the man refused to attack bin Ladin at all until he was motivated to action by a threat to his own political safety. We were not angry he'd attacked bin Ladin; we were angry he hadn't attacked bin Ladin before (or after, actually; anyone remember a subsequent attack?).
Who the hell does this narcisstic sociopath think he's fooling? Does he really imagine he can sell the American people on the proposition that........as Glenn B would say..........Republicans were actually less committed to dropping bombs on "brown people" than he was?
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on September 25, 2006 at 5:04 AM
| link to this | reply
Nanaroo, I just realized tonight while walking to the store, my former boss, at my part time library job in the archives dept., had a daughter named Anna. He called her "Annaroo"! Lol
posted by
kingmi
on September 24, 2006 at 9:09 PM
| link to this | reply
kingmi
wow-! I enjoyed your interpretation of this!
posted by
Nanaroo
on September 24, 2006 at 7:00 PM
| link to this | reply