Go to Janes Opinion
- Add a comment
- Go to Leaking Like a Sieve -- So Much for National Security
blogflogger, I'm not even going to grace your asinine comment with
a thorough response. It's a complete waste of my time to think that you would have the decency to be fair minded about this. Typical lib dem response so of course I'm not surprised.
posted by
JanesOpinion
on October 6, 2006 at 6:55 AM
| link to this | reply
Straightforward, it's OK if they break the rules and leak whatever the heck
they want leaked. But if the Repbublicans do the same it's called breaking the law. They're so two faced I could spit!
posted by
JanesOpinion
on October 6, 2006 at 6:54 AM
| link to this | reply
Writeroflight -- you got it! The double standards
are there for honest folk to see.
posted by
JanesOpinion
on October 6, 2006 at 6:53 AM
| link to this | reply
Each time I realize I am once again reading one of your posts I slap ...
... my forehead and shake my head in disgust. Your lack of facts and pure right-rhetoric writings are a perfect example of why I think we deserve the disasters the right has brought to our country and the world. I guess silly things like reality mean little to the authoritarian followers on the right. God save us from the ignorant of the world.
posted by
blogflogger
on October 5, 2006 at 9:32 PM
| link to this | reply
What was their outrage about in the case they were seeking an "outing" for?
If it is about the leakage, then it is indeed double standards or selective outrage as u call it.
posted by
Straightforward
on October 5, 2006 at 7:18 PM
| link to this | reply
Bingo!
"It’s interesting that the Democrats did not rail against the publication of this classified material in the media earlier this week, yet they are still calling for heads to roll over the “outing” of CIA agent Valerie Plame last year. This highly selective outrage against leaks, however, lays bare the Democrats’ shameless opportunism and rank hypocrisy."
Also interesting that they ignore the newly declassified sections of the Estimate that contradict their pessimism about Iraq, even calling for victory when they want defeat, and that they hold the warning about Iraq as true after discredting other intelligence about WMDs from the same source as unreliable. 
posted by
WriterofLight
on October 5, 2006 at 7:16 PM
| link to this | reply