Go to Why can't I sue the whole country?
- Add a comment
- Go to TIME TO VOTE FOR A PERSON, NOT AGAINST SOMEONE OR FOR A PARTY
RSM, that was no joke
What Corbin said was childish and showed a lack of respect. It implied that Obama had no plans and more of less was trying to say that all that I said in this post was worthless. That is very clear.
It was NOT disagreement nor was it criticism. It was him being his childish self, which seems to be a very common way for conservatives here on Blogit to act.
I have a very thick skin, but I know better. Corbin was clearly mocking my views here and you are defending that mockery. And both of you are only helping to prove my point. Neither of you have presented anything to show that I was wrong, but Corbin made his childish mockery and then you defended it, all because you are both conservatives and refuse to go beyond that.
If Corbin came out and actually talked about where he saw that I was mistaken, discussed the problems he had with what I said here and gave some form of real input and dialogue, that would be different. But he came in mocking my views in a very childish fashion, which is the way those like him and yourself react most of the time to differing views. I've seen it too many times to fall for the load of BS you and him are trying to push on me right now.
If we decided to be foolish and pretend that he was asking a real question, it overly proves my point then. If he is so clueless as to not know about Obama's plans, then that means he has done nothing at all to compare candidates. He has gone and picked his party's candidate as the person to vote for without being open minded and looking at what each of them stands for. he would then just blindly be voting for his own party just because it is his party, which is about as wrong as it gets as to who people should vote.
So either Corbin is being childish or he is being stupid. I'll let you decided which one.
posted by
kooka_lives
on June 21, 2008 at 10:38 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM, Don't start
Hey, dude, can you even take a joke? Apparently not.
I did not see where Corbin 'attacked' you or your character or anything else. However, you unloaded on him in the usual fashion. Read it again. Then again maybe liberals do think with the left side of the brain only. I fail to see where Corbin so brutally attacked you in his comments. C'mon are you all that weak and offended to the point you can not or will not accept any criticism or disagreement with your views? You must have a thicker skin than that is you wish to debate politics.Give me a break Kooka!
posted by
RedStatesMan
on June 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM -spelling correction
instead of "right" you spell it "rite" -- rite?
as in "rite" for MY NAME IS EARL
your humor would fit right in
posted by
Xeno-x
on June 19, 2008 at 7:33 PM
| link to this | reply
RSM
you are funny
good stand up act
why you could right for MY NAME IS EARL
posted by
Xeno-x
on June 19, 2008 at 7:29 PM
| link to this | reply
RSM, Don't start
This shows the a bigger part of the problem,. You will defend Corbin here, not because he is right, but because he is a Conservative like you. You don't care one bit that he insulted me first. You only care that I responded do him with an equal lack of respect that he showed me.
His comment here was childish and meant to be an insult. And don't even try to pretend it could be seen as anything else. If he wishes to show no respect, that is what he will get in return. In fact Corbin seems to have a harder time earning my respect than you do.
And then of course here you are showing no respect at all, not even addressing eth subject of the post itself. Instead you straight out mock me and my father just because you are trying to defend your fellow conservative above actually showing integrity.
This is the kind of thing that really makes it hard for me to show you any respect at all. Although it does say a lot when instead of addressing the issue you try to find something to use to attack my character.
And you are right, in the future I shall do all I can to not call him and you insulting names, such as conservative or fundamentalist. Those really have to be about the worst things you could possible call a person, ever. I know I would be greatly insulted if someone were to ever use either of those names to describe me. After all those are the only names I actually call Corbin in that comment.
posted by
kooka_lives
on June 19, 2008 at 7:23 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: And it's obvious you choose to attack someone......
Kooka, you were doing so well in our last exchange of ideas and comments by not calling names and insults now you jump on Corbin for no reason. I am disappointed in you so I must expand on Corbin's father and son dynamic duo comment:
Xeno: "Quick, Kooka, to the CRATmobile!
Kooka: "The DEMO model, Cratman?"
Xeno: "Yes, Kooka, the Yugo! There is another conservative attacking modern liberal atheistic political thought!"
Kooka: "Cratman, its' Corbin! I'll hit with my super adolescent insulting and demeaning gun."
Xeno: "Good job Kooka. That should take care of him! Now, back to the Cratcave!"
Tune in next week when you will hear Kooka say:
"Holy Ronald Reagans Cratman, its' RedStatesMan!"
posted by
RedStatesMan
on June 19, 2008 at 6:58 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin
It was clear by your statement that you were attacking me for planning on voting for Obama and trying to say that he has no real plans. I've read enough of your BS here to know that is what you are trying to imply. The comment you left was 100% sarcastic and just childish. I know I would never put on that kind of a childish act about McCain and his plans.
I could easily give you a list of what Obama stand for and has as plans, but you already know it all and just wish to pretend otherwise. I already have compared both Obama and McCain by what their claimed plans are, and Obama not only seems to have better thought out goals, but he is looking at a much wider range of ideas. Go to their web sites and compare what each has to say. That is what I did to know who was the better person to vote for.
I only show people equal respect here in my comments sections. After all you are the one who blocks people just because they are able to 100% show you that you are wrong and what you post is pure BS and propaganda. I know that is why you blocked me. You were trying to push you anti-homosexual agenda and I pointed out that you were wrong using actual facts. I got blocked. I was not rude to you, nor did I insult you in that last comment to you before you blocked me. And here you comment on my posts showing a complete lack of respect for me and you think I should not treat you the same? Sorry, but if you come here showing no respect, that is what you will get back from me.
posted by
kooka_lives
on June 19, 2008 at 5:47 PM
| link to this | reply
And it's obvious you choose to attack someone......
instead of addressing the question posed......BTW....I'll leave the personal attacks and name calling to the father and son dynamic duo.....ROTFLMAO!
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on June 19, 2008 at 5:26 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: Corbin, Could you stop acting so childish for once?
yo son
these guys gotta knock anything they're against -- they don't use logical argument, only innuendo and labels.
posted by
Xeno-x
on June 19, 2008 at 3:45 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin, Could you stop acting so childish for once?
Is it actually possible for you to break away from your closed minded conservative fundamentalist ideas and look at the big picture?
Obama's plans are right here for all to see. Check out his web site and his speeches and listen to what he is saying, without your 'conservative blinders' on. You dislike Obama only because he is a liberal democrat and that is about it. You attack him blindly just because you know nothing else. Just as you have blindly defended Bush and everything he has done that has helped to bring this nation down to where it is.
You are a sad, sad person.
obviously this post was just over your head, mostly because you are one of those who just do not want to have to think for yourselves but would rather go on blindly voting for your party, just because it doesn't take any thinking on your part to do that.
posted by
kooka_lives
on June 19, 2008 at 3:13 PM
| link to this | reply
I'm glad to hear from someone who is voting for Obama's plans.....
now would you be kind enough to spend 10-15 seconds and "specifically" explain what they are???
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on June 19, 2008 at 2:40 PM
| link to this | reply